InShot vs VSCO
“Which one wastes more of your one finite, irreplaceable life? We ran the numbers. We made the numbers up. The result is somehow still accurate.”
InShot
“Edit a quick clip, then spend twenty minutes hunting the editor under a watermark.”
| Feature | InShot | VSCO |
|---|---|---|
| 🕳️ Hours Wasted / Day | 2.6 hrs | 8.0 hrs More hours = clear winner of nothing. |
| 🔥 Lifetime Damage | 22.4M hrs | 25.1M hrs |
| Our Rating | 4.5 | 3.9 |
| App Store | ||
| Google Play | 4.8 | 3.5 |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Downloads | 500M+ More victims downloaded. | 100M+ |
| Size | ||
| In-App Purchases 💸 | ||
| Requires Internet | ||
| Age Rating | Everyone | Teen |
| Developer | InShot Video Editor | VSCO |
By our entirely fabricated metrics, InShot wins the race to the bottom of your free time. VSCO is the “responsible” choice, in the way that a slightly smaller slice of cake is responsible. There are no winners here. Only documented hours.
Pick Your Poison
Choose InShot if...
InShot is a solid mobile editing app, well-suited for beginners and intermediate users who need a quick and easy way to create content for social media. While its free version is quite capable, professional users may find its subscription model necessary to unlock its full potential, although should consider the reported support issues and ensure the feature set is actually delivering.
Choose VSCO if...
VSCO remains the gold standard for aesthetic photo editing if you're willing to pay $30/year, but casual users should look elsewhere after recent paywall changes locked previously free features. Professional mobile photographers will find the preset library worth the investment, while Android users should temper expectations due to persistent platform disparities.
Get InShot
Get VSCO
Every stat above is affectionately invented. The apps are real, the regret is real, the numbers are vibes. “Requires: stable Wi-Fi, poor impulse control, and a willingness to question your life choices at 2 AM.”